Posted: Tue 1st Dec 2020

Flintshire solicitor whose false accounting left a clients account short by nearly £900,000 struck-off

News and Info from Deeside, Flintshire, North Wales

A solicitor who used “premeditated, calculated and repeated” false accounting to leave his client account short by more than £880,000 has been struck off.

A Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) disciplinary tribunal found “multiple findings of dishonesty” against Richard Clive Hallows, who owned Hallows Associates in Mold.

It said he had been “teeming and lading” (a form of false accounting) where he moved cash from one account to another and settled monies owed to clients using money from other customers.

As of January 31, 2018, the SRA judged he “caused a client account shortfall of at least £884,580.41” which was not replaced, in breach of accounting rules.


Hallows had also been using cheques from a company associated with his wife to give the impression accounts had more money in them than they actually had.

A statement would be sent to satisfy clients showing the inflated funds, before the cheques bounced and were cancelled.

The disciplinary tribunal, held in October this year, found: “His actions were premeditated, calculated and repeated over a significant period of time.

“He had sought to conceal his wrongdoing by making excuses as regards the return of client monies and by falsely boosting the client account balance with cheques that he knew would not clear.

“He had displayed no insight, had not made good the shortfall and had not co-operated with the Applicant during the investigation and the proceedings.”

It added he had caused “huge damage to the reputation of the profession”, his clients had “suffered significant harm” and his conduct had been “a complete departure from the standards expected of him by the profession and the public”.

The findings said Hallows’ conduct was “aggravated by his proven and admitted dishonesty” and the only mitigation for his actions had been his “previously unblemished record”.

Among the findings against Hallows it showed he’d admitted receiving £600,000 from Client A in August 2017 but used some of it to pay out £404,074.75 to Client G on 23 August 2017.

He also paid out £10,000 to a third party with the reference “Shawbrook” and £8,000 in respect of a Tribunal claim against him.

An email showed Hallows told Client A his funds were still “held to order” on September 19, 2017. By September 26, 2017, he only held a total of £35,620.74 for all of his clients the tribunal heard.

In an interview in February 2018 he admitted he had used Client G’s ledger to pay £197,940 to his own office bank account; £110,000.00 to Mr J; and £40,499 to HMRC.

Hallows was the executor of Client D’s estate and £147,681.24 was transferred imto the firm’s client bank account on July 12, 2016.

However between then and November 2, 2016, he transferred £49,228.00 of the estate to the firm’s office bank account with no good reason.

An “intervention” stopping Hallows from practising as a solicitor was first issued by the SRA on February 15, 2018, after one of its forensic investigators inspected the firm’s ledgers.

His practising certificate was reinstated with conditions on July 5, 2018, but Hallows was declared bankrupt at the High Court 25 days later on July 30 and his practising certificate was suspended again.

He tried to get the hearing adjourned on medical grounds but a letter from his doctor “contained insufficient information to support the Respondent’s application to adjourn the proceedings on the basis of his health” – and it was dismissed.

Hallows had also attempted to stay the hearing because he was on police bail, claiming evidence heard at the tribunal could “compromise” his defence in the police matters.

The tribunal found Hallows had been arrested by police on April 4, 2019, but had been released on bail and not charged, meaning “criminal proceedings were not imminent”, and rejected his application.

The Tribunal decided due to the serious nature of the misconduct, “in that it involved multiple findings of dishonesty”, the only appropriate and proportionate sanction was to strike him off the Roll of Solicitors.

Jez Hemming – Local Democracy Reporter (more here).



Spotted something? Got a story? Send a Facebook Message | A direct message on Twitter | Email: News@Deeside.com

LATEST NEWS...

Two multi-million pound care facilities set to open in Flintshire in near future

News

Glyndwr University offering free courses to boost physical activity development skills

News

Airbus Broughton workers to be balloted on a shorter working week in bid to save jobs

News

Flintshire council set to take lead on emergency scheme to protect bus services as passenger numbers drop

News

Welsh Government to strengthen legislation to ensure workplaces and shops are safer

News

North Wales woman who had to fight for her life after losing mum to COVID-19 urges people to stay home

News

Health minister announces mandatory coronavirus testing for travellers into Wales

News

Two former Coleg Cambria students paving the way for future generations in agriculture

News

St. David’s Day to be celebrated virtually between 1-5 March

News